The Employment Development Department (EDD) in California administers one of the nation's largest public benefit systems with over 21 million claimants and 63 million claims being filed for Unemployment Insurance (UI), Disability Insurance (DI), and Paid Family Leave (PFL) over the past decade. The EDD organization also supports many auxiliary business functions for hundreds of thousands of employers, medical providers, and other stake holders. Through the EDDnext project, the state will engage with communities across California to help design and implement systems and services that are easier to use and adapt to changing circumstances.
The challenge is to create a seamless and consistent experience across EDD’s different benefit programs and channels even though each program has vastly different processes, technologies, legal requirements, and customer needs. From the customer’s perspective all services come from EDD and so interactions and experiences should be consistent across programs and channels.
Various EDD programs are in different stages of automation, from manual processes and paper to a more seamless digital experience. Additionally, the programs have different degree of standards and controls. Each program has its own distinct set of operations, technologies, databases, and interfaces. Moreso, each program has its own policies, regulations, rules that manifest in unique eligibility standards and processes. In spite of these differences, this service is seeking to create a seamless and consistent experience for our customers across all of our programs and channels.
As a results of these differences, we see the following challenges:
- Customers have a disjointed and inconsistent experience across different channels and programs resulting in frustration and inefficiency
- Lack of automation results in time-consuming, manual, duplicative processes that impact the accuracy of claims processing and timeliness of payments
- Lack of language translation standards and use of multiple language translation solutions
- Lack of cost effective solutions and methodologies for quality management
- Inconsistent Key Performance Indicators across multiple programs
- Lack of real-time Quality Assurance monitoring and validation for claims processing, customer service, product delivery, data, processes, etc.
- Misalignment and difficulty in adoption of market standards, industry standards, and best practices on existing products and tools