Background
The Employment Development Department (EDD) in California administers one of the nation's largest public benefit systems with over 21 million claimants and 63 million claims being filed for Unemployment Insurance (UI), Disability Insurance (DI), and Paid Family Leave (PFL) over the past decade. The EDD organization also supports many auxiliary business functions for hundreds of thousands of employers, medical providers, and other stake holders. Through the EDDnext project, the state will engage with communities across California to help design and implement systems and services that are easier to use and adapt to changing circumstances. .
Given scope and mandates, EDD programs largely operate independently of each other, and different programs have different channels and platforms where customers submit benefits information. Each program currently operates its own distinct set of technologies, databases, and interfaces, which to a certain degree hasresulted in each program developing its own policies, regulations, and rules that manifest in unique eligibility requirements and processes. Various EDD programs are in different stages of automation, from manual and paper-based processes, to more seamless digital processes. One of the primary goals of EDDNext is to eliminate barriers to the creation of a cohesive and consistent experience for customers across all programs and channels.
Currently, EDD has a robust and mature Project Services Group, aka PMO. However, with the volume of workloads, assignments, and tasks for the EDDNext project and all ancillary initiatives, there is a need to help supplement, align, and complement the current PSG operation.
As a result of these objectives, we foresee the following challenges:
- Multiple concurrent engagements requiring various additional project management assets
- Difficulty in coordinating all activities with varying priorities, available resources, and goals
- Inconsistencies in project definitions across multiple initiatives
- Lack of consolidated visibility relative to resource allocation and availability
- Challenges with portfolio management and resource management tools
- Limited expertise in CDT’s Project Approval Lifecycle (PAL) methodology and requirements
- Recognition of high-profile projects requiring elevated degrees of visibility
- Lack of organizational flexibility to meet the increased demand of PMs
- Difficultly in management of projects with multiple workstreams
- Difficulty in facilitation of discussions with SMEs to build consensus
- Lack of organizational KSAs and experience working on Plans of Action and successful achievement of Milestones